Sunday, July 13, 2008

Xobni oranizes your inbox

Xobni is inbox spelled backwards. Beside that it is a tool that allows you to organize your Outlook inbox within seconds.

Inbox organizer

Highlights are:

  • Fast search of your inbox (and other mail folders).
  • Organizes your contacts.
  • Let you see lots of useless statistics on to whom and how you use your e-mail..
  • Integrates with LinkedIn.

With fast local search - like Windows Indexing service, Copernic Desktop search and Google you can find anything you want within seconds as long as you know how to spell your search.

While Xobni only indexes your e-mail it seems to do a better job at letting you find your e-mails as you can search on contact and continue from there.

You can also se who knows who as it analyzes mail headers and build social networks based on this information.

From one day of usage I really like this program. This is a tool that you will not live without. But Xobni has to mature first - it crashed Outlook three times for me before I decided to uninstall it.

Labels: ,

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Web Developer Toolbar in IE

From time to time we are all curious on how other people do their web design. Unfortunately it is not always easy to read the code and find what you need.

Are there anything we can do about this?

search

Yes it is! I believe there are many tools out there that can assist you. I have looked into two tools that I found interesting.

IE WebDeveloper US$115 (non-commercial).
Microsoft Developer Toolbar Freeware.

IE WebDeveloper

This is the tool from the same guys that gave you HTTP Analyzer. I have talked about this tool in a previous article.

Anyway. After I installed this tool Internet Explorer started to crash all the time. But from what I could see it seems like a good product - easy to find the information you are looking for.

Developer Toolbar

Given it's price it is priceless. Not as good to work with, seems to lack some features in WebDeveloper. But given the price this is what I am going to use.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Looking into HTTP traffic with Internet Explorer

I work a lot with web applications and from time to time I need to look in to the HTTP session - what headers are sent back and forth and what web page elements takes time to load.

magnifying glass

I have found two products that does this well. I will cover these in details below.

HttpWatch

HttpWatch from Simtec Limited. This product seems to be the most mature of these two. It have cool features, the most important one is beeing able to show you what the web client spends it time on; DNS lookup, TCP session setup, or the data transfer.

You can look into HTTPS traffic.

The major drawback is the price. It cost $295 for a one user license. As a result I did not test this product any further.

IE Inspector

IE Inspector from IEInspector Software is a nice application. It works much like HttpWatch above, but is much cheaper. It lacks the capability to show what a page spends it time on doing; you just get the end result.

You can look in to the HTTP headers sent to the web server and what HTTP headers are received. You can see detailed cache information about Internet Explorer cached elements.

You can also purchase a module that analyzes other applications that uses HTTP. This is nice if you want to test other applications communicating over HTTP.

You can look into HTTPS traffic only if you use the Internet Explorer integrated decoder.

If you buy both modules as a non-commercial license you end up with US$99. If you happen to be commercial the price is $129. Either way it is much cheaper than HttpWatch.

Ethereal

Ethereal is the Swiss army knife of packet decoding. You can't live without it. The tools mentioned above presents HTTP traffic in an easy way. But Ethereal gives you a lot more - if you learn how to use it.

It is open source. And we can't dislike open source!

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Big-IP review

Do you need to put your web server on steroids? Do you find it slow and do not know what to do? If you have the money, I have the solution.

A speeding turtle

Here is one solution for you. The Big-IP is a all-in-one box where you can do lots to tweak your web server performance and reliability. Features includes:

  • Connection pooling from the Big-IP to your backend web server. This offloads connection setup time on your web server.
  • SSL offloading when you encrypt your web pages. With this feature you do not need to spend web server CPU cycles to manage SSL sessions.
  • RAM cache is also possible which offloads static content that is downloaded all the time. You can also cache dynamic content if you want.
  • Compression of content. Most of the content on a web server is compressible. With this feature enabled you can save bandwidth, speed up clients on slow lines and load web pages faster. On a site with much content you can expect 60-70% reduction in bandwidth requirements using this feature.
  • Load balancing with failover. If your solution needs more than one web server you can load balance traffic and as soon as a node fails it will be removed from the pool.
  • Web accelerator combines several technologies to try speed up.
  • HTTP header manipulation. You can manipulate every http header if you want.

What you will use depends on your requirements and wallet. Some of the features above are expensive, but they all work great. You will have to pay about US$20,000 for the entry level platform.

The Big-IP platform

After one week of work on this platform I have to say that I am impressed. It is relatively easy to use and configure. All the basic configuration settings are configured from a web page. Just spend some minutes and read their quick startup guide to get familiar with their naming conventions.

With less than one hour of configuration you should see improvements on your solution.

Big-IP customizations

One think I really like is that if I need something that F5 did not think about I can tweak it myself. Here is the code to cache HTTP 302 replies and redirect my secure site to HTTPS.

when HTTP_RESPONSE {
 if { [HTTP::status] == "302" } {
 CACHE::enable
 }
}
when HTTP_REQUEST {
 if { [HTTP::uri] starts_with "/secure"} {
 HTTP::redirect https://mysite/secure
 }
}

This is called iRules. The language is based on TCL.

RAM cache

Squid is probably the most known cache server in the world. But it is only a cache. Big-IP is lots and lots of more, but probably not the best cache-only solution. It only caches to memory, so if you serve big content like images, videos and so forth and require a big cache this is not the best solution.

But for all other uses it works great in conjunction with compression and load balancing.

Web Accelerator

This module rewrites the web page so it loads faster and tries not to transfer redundant data twice to the client. This is at least what F5 says.

Out of the box the web accelerator have profiles for Microsoft Exchange Server and Sharepoint. (And some others, but I don't remember now.)

On low bandwidth and high latency inline objects (like images, CSS, javascript) are rewritten to be downloaded from other servers. This to overcome the limitation in Internet Explorer to only open open two connections to one server at a time.

Combined with compression this should make some chatty Microsoft web applications more speedy over the Internet.

Conclusion

I love this product. It have lots of features and you can tweak and tune it to fit to most web applications. I spent much time evaluating the RAM cache but see lots of potential in all the other features.

The Big-IP documentation is not impressive. Nor the Wiki on DevCentral. You need to spend some time to figure out how to use it if you need custom features.

PS! The load balancer feature is not only for web traffic. All kind of traffic can be load balanced.

Good luck! If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask me!

Labels: ,

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

NovaMind

Some time ago I wrote about NovaMind and that I did not like the program. I got lots of complaints by people that do like this program.

As a result of this I decided to give NovaMind a second try. After all - NovaMind only have one product and it better work, right? I have been using NovaMind for about three weeks now.

Starting to learn

Compared to all the other mind managers I have tried NovaMind takes some time to learn. The ribbon menus really are troublesome to learn. Even if images says a thousand words I do not believe this is true for menu items.

I started up by reading all available tutorials and documentation to get a hold of what features I should now and how to use them.

Step by step I found out how to use NovaMind and I also learned what I did wrong in the first place.

Is it as bad as I first said?

My short answer is no. Even though I do miss lots of creative/useful features NovaMind is not a bad product. And compared to the cost of US$99 I now find NovaMind very interesting. You can read more about what I miss and what I like below.

Memory consumption

NovaMind loves your memory. My Vista computer with only a half a gigabyte of memory peaks out when I installed the 5 free available graphics add-ons. For my everyday work I find 200MB of memory usage to be very high. With this memory consumption it uses more memory than Outlook and Opera together. (And these programs love memory.)

Cool features

There are some cool features that I do like very much with NovaMind. They are;

  • RapidFire. When RapidFire is enabled you can write subtopics without the need for an extra enter when you have created a topic.
  • Rainbow colors. All topics below the root gets their own color based on the placement. Why this? The brain works better with different colors and images.

Features I miss

First of all - I love to use the keyboard. NovaMind is not designed for ease of use with the keyboard.

  • General zooming and panning. Try to zoom in and out without using the mouse.
  • Focus on a topic. Compare to MindManager F3 function which collapses all other branches and let you focus on the one you are working on.
  • Try to get to recent files without using the mouse. You can't open the menu at all using your keyboard.
  • The new Windows key to the right of the keyboard shows you the same menu as you get when you right-click on a topic. You can move but you can't choose anything without left-clicking with your mouse.

Conclusion

 I was wrong. Nova-Mind is not as bad as I first thought after all. When I learned to use it. Nova-Mind just announced version 4 of their editor. With this new version they will change both pricing and the feature list. You can read more here. Recently they have also released some new releases of version 3.

Labels:

Monday, April 16, 2007

Wink video capture

I just wrote about codecs and screen scaptures. When I was finished with the article I found a cool program called Wink from Debugmode.

capture

Wink is a screen video capture program that allows you to edit it - add annotations, balloons, text and so forth.

Highlights are freeware, easy to use and optimized outputs.

Have a look yourself at the Wink product page.

Labels: ,

Monday, April 09, 2007

Screen capture codecs and tools

I have been looking into codec's for capturing the screen into videos. The reason for doing this is to produce videos from the screen wich are both small in size and with the best possible quality. Codecs for movies do not have the optimal characteristics for screen videos.

You can search your self with Google.

Codec Comment
MSU Screen Capture Lossless Codec Codec that produces the smallest files possible without loosing quality.
FM Screen Capture codec Codec from the producers of ScreenVirtuoso. Outputs are about twice as big as with MSU.
TechSmith Screen Capture Codec (TSCC) This codec can only be used to encode movies when you have a valid license for Camtasia Studio. You can download this codec free of charge to decode movies.

Capture programs

To use the codec's you need a program to capture the screen to a movie. Google can help out here as well.

Program Comment
SnagIt Good to capture still images. With videos you can only capture it, not manipulate it. Read my review here. You can encode with any installed codec.
ScreenVirtuoso Capture tool with some options. Captures  media output as well. (DVD's, media player etc.)
ALLcapture Another capture tool. They seem to have their own codec. And their own tool TurboDemo to create something useful out of the capture.

Good luck!

Labels: ,

Capture with SnagIt and Camtasia

Screen capture and video capture of the screen? Is it possible and how do I do it?

TechSmith have two programs to do just that. There are of course others, but today I will focus on TechSmith.

SnagIt 8 Camtasia Studio 4
Capture still images and records video. Captures video with own optimized codec. Still images if you purchase SnagIt bundle.
Very good options for editing your images. Created to capture video and make movies of output.
Outputs to all common image formats, and .AVI for videos. You can choose codec for output. Final output includes MPEG, AVI, Flash, RealMedia, QuickTime and executable. You have full control of output settings.

SnagIt - $39.95

SnagIt is a world known and reputable screen capture program. I love it - in addition to capture images (as you can do with alt+print screen) you can do lots to the final image. You can change perspective, add edge effects, highlight text, add arrows, add callouts and more.

If you send screen dumps in emails or make user documentation this a must-have tool.

Camtasia Studio 4 - $299

Charged with good hope after using SnagIt I downloaded Camtasia and decided to try it out.

I expected to find a tool to make videos as easy as SnagIt makes screen shots. But no, I did not manage to do anything usable with Camtasia. I can zoom and pan, but did not manage to do anything else with it.

If you want to make something out of a capture - look into Photodex ProShow first. I have already blogged about it.

Labels: ,

Freemind 0.8.0

Earlier I wrote about mind managers. This article will focus on FreeMind from the Open Source Community.

You can see a video here.

FreeMind 0.8.0

A great product - compared to price. It is easy to use and let you focus on being creative. You can change key bindings to whatever you need.

What is bad?

  • Open Source. It is not in release 1 yet.
  • Java. It's just not good as GUI's.
  • Not all key mappings work.
  • Menus does not work. I have to press the hotkey after I have found it in the menu.

Labels:

Novamind

Earlier I wrote about mind managers. This article will focus on NovaMind from the company with the same name.

You can see a video here.

NovaMind

This product did not work for me. I could not make it work the way I wanted. I could not find anything on the menus. They use the new menu system you get with Office 2007. That is images instead of text buttons.

The good?

I think it is a good program if you can make it work.

Labels:

Visual Mind 8

Earlier I wrote about mind managers. This article will focus on Visual Mind from Mind Technologies.

You can see a video here.

Visual Mind 8

It is fun to see that we Norwegians can make good products! For this is a great product. No doubt about it.

When your purpose is to use your mind and make maps this product is easy to use, and won't distract you with lots of options.

Navigation between branches of the map is easy, you can do lot from the keyboard.

It comes in two flavors to choose from. Except for image export the home version got everything I need.

What is bad?

  • The home edition does not allow you to export your maps to images.
  • JPEG quality is not good as you can see from the red and green boxes on this image.
  • On my Vista it crashed a few times.

Visual Mind 9

This product is currently in beta, and I have not looked at it. But they will ship a client/server version allowing several people to work on the same map. Exiting.

Labels:

mind managers

Today we will be looking into mind maps and mind managers - software to manage your mind.

A mind map is a diagram used to represent words, ideas, tasks or other items linked to and arranged radially around a central key word or idea. It is used to generate, visualize, structure and classify ideas, and as an aid in study, organization, problem solving, and decision making.

There are lots of people making mind manager software, and I have not the resources to look into every one of them. I have chosen to look into a few products, as you can see below. As I look into it for personal use price is the (almost) most important element for me. That the software works for me, is easy to use and that I feel I have control over it is also important.

How do I use a mind map?

Mind map from writing this articleTake a look at this mind map, created with an evaluation version of Visual Mind 8. You can see from the map what I looked into during this article. There are of course many other ways to make use of a mind map. You need to figure out for your self what works for you.

Disclaimer: The map above is a copy from the process. It does not necessarily reflect my final opinion on a product. Please read my product review instead.

What are the two prices above?

I have listed two prices; Price home and Price Pro. Some vendors sell a crippled version for personal use. You will have to read the product homepage your self to find the differences. Usually you loose these features;

  • Task management.
  • Export to MS Office and some other formats. (Even images.)
  • Support for multiple maps in a project.

Product review

This is a short review of the different tools. Read the full article for more information about each product.

Product Score
Visual Mind Dice 5
MindMAP Dice 5
FreeMind Dice 4
MindJet Mind Manager Dice 3
NovaMind Dice 1

For me - I have to choose between FreeMind, Visual Mind and MindMAP. Both are good products that I felt comfortable with.

You can see a video here.

Labels:

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Opuzz Royalty Free Music

In the past I have been looking into viable options for royalty free music. I found lots of options - covering everything from small to big sites with lots of music. Many sites also have loops and sound effects as well.

First I want to clear up any misapprehensions about royalty free music. The music is not free - you need to buy it. But when you have bought it you can use it for whatever purpose your license agreement allows you to use it without paying any royalty. From an economical perspective this is good as you have fixed expenses you can include in the budget.

Royalty free music's counterpart is big organizations like RIAA. If you want to use music they manage you'll have to pay a royalty per use. That is usually more expensive - trust me.

music note with wings

But today I'll write about Opuzz, a royalty free music site that just crossed my web browser. There are several thing I like about Opuzz:

  • They use a blog as a communication platform with their customers. This way you can see what they have been doing in the past.
  • There are no limits in their license. It makes it easier for me as I don't need to count downloads, uses or anything else.
  • You can purchase small parts of a song or the song as a whole. Small parts of a song if of course cheaper than the whole song.
  • Instant download. (If your order is less then US$100, and not loops either.)

Price

As with everything - price is important. If it is too expensive you will walk away. Opuzz have several prices, one for about whatever need you may have. From buying one track (US$29.95) to all versions of a track (US$34.99) the gap to buying the complete CD online (US$59) is small. Price
Stingers $2.99
Music Loops $4.99
10-seconds $4.99
15-seconds $9.99
30-seconds $14.99
60-seconds $19.99
Full Length $29.99
Alternate Mixes $14.99
Music CDs $59
CD Downloads (download entire CD!) $59!
Quote from their website on March 28, 2007

Music CD promotions

When I move back and forth I often find "Music CD Promo" - which sounds great. Two CD's for only US$79. But when you read the small print you'll see that it only applies to physical CDs only.

I'd love to see same or better promotions for downloads as well!

Loops

I found one loop collection that sounded interesting. Their best-seller Music Loop collection Vol 1 with a total of 117 loops at only US$49. A bargain - so I bought it.

But what do I find? Each collection contains about 30 loops. But each song (from where the loop is made) you get three versions. This gives you loops from 10 different songs.

This was not what I expected, and I am somewhat disappointed. Opuzz should be more clear about what is included in their loop. And I should have been more skeptic as this information is not easily available.

You can listen to a flash demo of all three jingle-bells loops here.

Quality of music

What is quality? What goes for me does not have to be what goes for you. But big collections makes it easier to find something you like! And with good categories it is easy to search for the song you need.

Hard drive

Opuzz sells a hard drive with all of their music for only US$1999. I have not seen this elsewhere, but I  like the idea. Unfortunately I can not afford it.

Conclusion

This seems to be a good web site with lots of music for a reasonable price. I miss sound effects - but will I ever be satisfied? :)

Labels:

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Music stocks compared

This article was updated on march 25. 2007 with a few more options in the comparison guide and the definition of price.

This article is an comparison guide between the different music stock options that I have looked into. I do not look at the quality of the music, but their prices and licenses as I believe they are more important to choose a starting point in the quest for music you can distribute.

Prices are for use on small websites or other small projects. Usually I have printed the lowest price for a complete track. Some offers part of tracks for a lower price.

music notes

Site Price
pr. song
US$
Distribution
limit
# copies
Comments
Opuzz 29.99 none Good price for albums of music - US$59. But read the fine print - no discount for "download only" purchases!
Stock-music 29.95 5000 You can buy their entire stock for US$199.
Stockmusic 29.95 none Albums available for US$99.95 and 10 songs for US$199.95.
Royalty Free Music 59.95
Subscription available.
5000 Albums available for US$99.95.
Shockwave-sound.com Varies a little, average 30 5000 Albums available for US$99.95.
Smart Sound 99.95 none Discounts available.
Soundrangers 49.95 none Clips available for lower prices. Very good choices of sound effects.
all music library 12.95 none  
Proud Music €59.50 1000 Expensive. I am not impressed by the music either...
Music Tracks Library Varies a litte, average is 19.90 1000  

Labels:

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Music stock brokers

A search at Google for stock music brokers gave me a few sites to choose from. So I decided to look into them to see what I can get today.

Most of the sites seems to have same price (collusive pricing???), around US$29.95 for a track with similar licenses.

notes

I listened to some of the music, and I am sorry to say that it is hard to find good music here. It seems like the good artists all joined up with RIAA. Most of the music I can find here is boring, alternative or best used as background music.

Labels:

Images at stockxpert

For some time ago I wrote about how to find and add cool graphics to your website. The site www.clipart.com is still a favorite of mine as they are cheap and have lots of cool drawing, art and photos.

€ house

But lately I have found out that I also want more real-life pictures on my site, in addition to clipart. But I don't want to pay much for it. Is this possible?

I found the site www.stockxpert.com where you can buy the right to use images starting at about US$1, depending on size and license you want.

Their metadata is not as consistent as with www.clipart.com but they sure got lots of images.

Give it a try!

Labels: ,

WAN optimization with Riverbed

Riverbed applianceToday I had a chance to work with a product for WAN optimization for the first time. I ran a live demo at a customers site.

thumb up It works. At least if your network traffic is predictable and repetitive. Most networks are, as clients tend to do much of the same.
thumb down It is too expensive for most customers. It is really hard to justify the cost and more importantly the return of investment.

A big network around the globe

Acceleration of SSL traffic

Rivedbed promised to support SSL in version 4 of their software. I can't wait to try this one out. It only requires you to install your private key on the box inside your datacenter.

Steelhead appliances now accelerate encrypted (SSL) traffic, using all of Riverbed's algorithms to deliver LAN-like performance for those key business applications.

Of course this won't work for external web sites as you don't have access to private keys. But for intranet applications this is cool!

Exchange 2007

Exchange 2007 supports encrypted MAPI connections. Much details on this issue is not known at this point.

Based on our testing, we've found that the encrypted connections that appear by default in an Exchange 2007 environment with Outlook 2007 clients are a proprietary "MAPI encryption", not SSL.

Impression

Dice 5Riverbed Steelhead appliances are easy to set up and work without the need to do much. Just make sure the traffic is unencrypted and leave the rest to Riverbed.

RiOS 4.0

I will do a new lab with RiOS 4.0 when it is released and do tests on Exchange, Sharepoint and web traffic. All SSL encrypted. If you are curious about this, please leave me a note.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, March 15, 2007

A peek at GoDaddy

Shared hosting at GoDaddy is cheap, but are they any good?

Earlier I talked about web hosting options, now I will look more in depth on GoDaddy, as they seemed most promising.

Their shared hosting starts at US$3.99 and gives you either Linux or Windows based hosting. With MSSQL (on Windows) and MySQL database access. They charge you monthly instead of yearly as many competitors do. And they don't require you to transfer the domain to them to host the site.

We're the affordable, reliable place to host your site

Computers

Linux and Windows plans compared

You can see all details here. Below you can find the most important differences.

Linux Windows
MySQL databases MySQL and MSSQL databases
PHP, SSI, FrontPage extensions, Java, ColdFusion, Python, Perl, Ruby ASP and .NET (1.1 or 2.0), ASP.NET Ajax, ColdFusion, FrontPage extensions
Apache IIS

Access to databases

You can access databases through a web interface. The interface is easy to use, but simple. You need to understand how to use databases. With MySQL you got an option to dump the database to file. But you cannot do so with MSSQL. There is no easy way for you to move the database in case you want to change hosting provider.

Changes to your configuration

You only have a few options you can tweak on your site. You can add subsites (subsite.domain.com) and set directory permissions (on Windows). All changes to your configuration takes up to 24 hours to complete.

You should not be in a hurry when you want to do changes as it takes time to do changes. When I created a database it took about one hour before it was ready for use. The web interface is always slow - GoDaddy can do this better. It takes a few seconds to load each page.

Access to your files

All files are accessible via FTP. GoDaddy have some limitations on the FTP access, at least on the economy and deluxe plans. You can only have two FTP sessions active at any time, and the speed is limited to 40kB/sec.

In short it takes time to transfer data to/from GoDaddy. If you have 10GB of data it takes at least 72 hours to transfer data off the site. And with small files it takes even longer because of the overhead involved with setting up file transfers.

Uptime and access times

What is uptime? I see uptime as when my website is available on the net. Uptime is hard to measure, as many different factors are involved. To monitor uptime and access times I have used ipMonitor and configured a probe that download a static file every 300 second.

With GoDaddy I have 99.7908% availability the last day on my Linux account (this blog). This is also the average. I have never had 100%. In comparison, the same measurement on Blogspot gives me 100% availability.

Both sites are located in the US, and access times are much higher than in Europe. Speed do not seem to be a problem. On large files you get the bandwidth you expect.

Conclusion

I like GoDaddy. They are cheap, and their products fits me. I just wish I could find a comparable solution in Europe. Until I find this, I will stay on GoDaddy.

Labels: ,